Suits me. I've been too useless to change mine anyway. ?

@phoneboy
I host my podcasts on s3 and I'm aware that a sudden spike in downloads would cost me a lot. It is a problem I wouldn't mind having though. Current costs for hosting and backup about 23 euros a month.
//

Ah. Yes, that is a different problem. I was thinking of me deciding to publish 16 versions of the same crappy episode.

No idea how you would throttle that sort of misuse, although I see it on some sites where they think I'm asking questions too fast to be a human.

add a little disincentive to doing things for the lulz. Like put a cap on the number of images per day that aren't happy puppies. For example.

Footnote 3 is interesting. I wonder whether that could be the justification for a freemium model.

Has anyone else noticed the neighbourhood going down the tubes?

Here's hoping.

I think I'll let the client figure that out, for now. He has considerably more expertise and experience with this sort of thing than I do, being a kind of developer. The miracle is that he wants me to write his copy, and knows that he cannot do it himself.

//

The main reason I asked is that a new client is the first I've had who is happy with some sort of version control for text, which I would love to encourage. He uses GitLab, and I could not clone the repository into GitHub. Nor did I want to get involved at this stage with Source Tree (although that's an option I am still considering).

In the end, he helped me clone his repository to my GitHub account, which is where I will work with it, and he will pull changes from there.

But I'm wondering how things he does in GitLab will get merged back to my version in GitHub.

It is all a bit confusing, even though I have been through a few of the training tutorials. I've never actually worked with Git of any flavour in a team, just on my own.

//

Right. But Hubs or Labs?